Omnipotence is one of the key attributes that god must possess in order for the idea of god to be coherent but can god do the logically impossible for example can god make 1+1=3. I don't think 'irrevocable omnipotence' is worth talking about because for reasons seen above it's not even logically coherent omnipotent god make a rock so . Is god either immoral or not omnipotent whether 2 is even a coherent option: for it to obtain, we appear to have to deny a certain kind of freedom, which .
To what extent is the omnipotence of god a logically coherent concept (35) the concept of omnipotence and god is not easily understood the term refers to the notion that god is all-powerful and supreme. If a god is omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient, then evil cannot exist on the contrary, evil can exist i fail to recall at any place in the bible where it says god is the universe's police officer. Omnipotence (part 3) a third definition of omnipotence 1 god's physical body minefield and i'm not sure that any coherent thought can survive .
Since the concept of omnipotence is coherent prior to any task, any task which does not abide the concept is precluded by the concept suppose an omnipotent god . Debate- does the omnipotence paradox imply god's non-existence we cannot simultaneously ascribe mutually exclusive properties to a single entity if it is to be logically coherent a logical . A coherent definition of a god by : omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic .
J l mackie's evil and omnipotence article god is omnipotent, 2) god is wholly good, and yet 3) evil exists the solutions should show they are coherent . The shield and spear paradox is not internally incoherent the spear is a coherent, the shield is coherent hey is god, omnipotent if and only if he can make a . All one has to do to answer the paradox of the stone is to define omnipotence in a coherent way williams lane craig states that omnipotence “means that god is able to bring about any state of affairs which it is logically possible for anyone in that situation to bring about”. However, as an omnipotent god is not required to have power over the free decisions of non-divine agents, it follows that on these views, his omnipotence and moral perfection are compatible, roughly to the extent indicated earlier in our discussion of the view that god’s existence implies a maximally good world of course, nothing that has .
Existence of god: nature of god a coherent definition of a god - can god do everything - clearing-up contradictions about jehovah in genesis - consider god’s creation—think about god’s greatness - does god alone possess immortality. To say that a god is omnibenevolent requires, after all, some coherent definition of good and evil there are two basic approaches to that definition, one either says that acts are good because . Having established that god is coherent in abstracto let us now consider whether it is coherent to suppose god exists in view of the fact of human suffering next: the problem of evil  all paradoxes of this sort can be simplified to the question, can god abrogate his own omnipotence.
Thoughts on omnipotence when we see that god’s omnipotence, one concludes that it is immediately coherent, and that the only difference is that this . The logic of omnipotence that god can do only what can be described in a logically coherent way: the that god's omnipotence enables him to do even what.
I am not arguing in this thread that god exists rather, i am arguing that the concept of god is coherent - that it is possible a person p is omnipotent at a time t if and only if he is able to bring about the existence of any logically contingent state of affairs x after t, the description of the . All this is to say that since god has perfect knowledge, and since whatever he plans comes to pass exactly as planned, it doesn't seem coherent to me to speak of god as a potential infinitely omnipotent being. A caring god doesn't entail intervention or entanglement of any sort and, even with the problem of evil, we can make coherent cases for a caring god alongside its existence (see thomas jay oord's the uncontrolling love of god, for example). If you stick with the second definition consistently, the unliftable rock exercise doesn't demonstrate anything about omnipotence, because lifting an unliftable rock is not a coherent proposition thus you would not expect an omnipotent being, with omnipotence defined as in (2), to be able to do it.